Home Your basket
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-operative complicati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Melanotic neuroectodermal...
   Price 8.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal tumours of the thre...
   Price 10.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validation of a self-asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical procedure in fir...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis management of W...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multidisciplinary managem...
   Price 14.00 €
• Surgery of the semicircul...
   Price 12.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Iatrogenic scarring of th...
   Price 12.00 €
• Voice Handicap Index adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• The eye movement autophon...
   Price 14.00 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Navigation in head and ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cemento-ossifying fibroma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 293.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2009 o

CANCER

Management of cervical lymph node recurrence of melanoma of the head and neck


Authors : Fakhry N, Tessonnier L, Cohen F, Gras R, Grob J-J, Giovanni A, Mundler O, Zanaret M. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2009;130,4:211-214.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: To compare the diagnostic accuracy between Positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET scan) and conventional work-up such as ultrasound (US) and/or Computed tomography (CT) in the detection of cervical lymph node recurrences of melanoma of the head and neck after initial cervical lymph node surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who presented with clinical and/or radiological suspicion of isolated cervical lymph node recurrence after lymph node surgery from April 2004 to January 2007. All patients underwent CT and/or US of the neck, and FDG-PET scan before salvage neck dissection. None of included patients had clinical or radiological detectable distant metastases at the time of the lymph node dissection. Performances of conventional imaging and FDG-PET scan in detection of lymph node recurrence were calculated and compared by using the histopathological results of lymphadenectomy as gold standard with Fischer's exact test. Results: Of the twelve cases in included in the study (9 patients, 3 of them had 2 consecutive lymph node redissection for a second lymph node recurrence), melanoma recurrence was found in 10 cases (83%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 78.6%, 40%, 78.6%, and 40% respectively for conventional imaging and 85.7%, 40%, 80% and 50% for FDG-PET scan. No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 methods. Conclusion: This is the first study that compares the diagnostic accuracy between FDG-PET scan and conventional imaging in the detection of cervical lymph node recurrence of melanoma of the head and neck. Our results showed that FDG-PET scan is actually not better than conventional imaging to detect these cervical lymphatic recurrences.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE