Home Your basket
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Stuttering and Tourette’s...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cat scratch disease: A di...
   Price 8.50 €
• Patient preference survey...
   Price 10.50 €
• A retrospective study of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arteriovenous haemangioma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Floating stapes footplate...
   Price 12.00 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• The input of autogenous g...
   Price 10.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenomatoid hamartoma of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Oculo-orbital complicatio...
   Price 14.00 €
• Merkel cell carcinoma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Epidemiology of paediatri...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long-term results of faci...
   Price 10.50 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-operative complicati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• The nasal framework in rh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Can homograft ossicles st...
   Price 5.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 292.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE