Home Your basket
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Using the superficial tem...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oropharyngeal reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €
• Termino-terminal hypoglos...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant osteoma of the maxi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Carotid body paragangliom...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal forcing and posture...
   Price 10.50 €
• The application of tusso...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital absence of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• An unusual cause of neona...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aesthetic profiloplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The ENT in operations … T...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chondrocalcinosis of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acute rhinosinusitis in a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma presenting ...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 325.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2007 o

PHONIATRICS

Evolution of voice assessment and quality of life after endoscopic laser cordectomy


Authors : Crevier-Buchman L, Colomb I, Hans S, Vaissière J, Brasnu D. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,5:315-320.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Endoscopic laser cordectomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique for Tis, T1 and selected T2 glottic carcinoma. The purpose of the study was to evaluate prospectively pre-operatively and 3 months after surgery i) acoustic and perceptual parameters, ii) quality of life through a self evaluation (VHI) test. Methods: A prospective longitudinal evaluation of 13 male patients, shared-out onto 3 surgical procedures (cordectomy type I, grouped type II and III, and type V). Patients were recorded before and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. The parameters recorded were; acoustic parameters (F0, Jitter, Shimmer), Maximum Phonation Time (MPT), perceptual evaluation using the GRBAS scale and the self evaluation scale with the Voice Handicap Index (VHI). Results: No statistics could be done because of the limited number of patients in each group. Perceptual and self evaluation data showed a favorable progression between 1 and 3 months for patients in group Type I, II and III cordectomy. Evolution of acoustic parameters is more difficult to analyze. The voice of the Cordectomy type V group remains whispery at 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: The quality of voice is a very important criterion for the patients. During the first 3 months after laser cordectomy, the perceptual vocal function and the self evaluation improves. But for the acoustic data, 3 months is probably too short to objectively quantify an improvement especially after type V cordectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE