Home Your basket
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lateral fixation of the v...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prosthetics gains and sat...
   Price 12.50 €
• Conference : Medicine of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dermatofibrosarcoma protu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic thyroid basi-ling...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adaptation and validation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral and recurrent f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Solitary myofibroma of th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrating hypopharyngeal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Moderate leukocyte infilt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Combined induction chemot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis....
   Price 8.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lingual granuloma of preg...
   Price 5.50 €
• Construction and validati...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare case of sarcoidosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Induction chemotherapy an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal mucocele...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bell's palsy: treatment b...
   Price 5.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• External otitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inferior turbinate hypert...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• A case of nasal foreign b...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sphenoid arachnoidocele: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multidisciplinary daytime...
   Price 12.00 €
• The ENT in operations … T...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Observational study to as...
   Price 14.00 €
• Association of thyroid he...
   Price 12.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 686.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE