Home Your basket
• Face and neck lift using ...
   Price 14.00 €
• "Sonorous man" - an appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice-breaking in adolesc...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intra-orbital infected cy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Blepharoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prospective study on 43 s...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paraganglioma of the cere...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ossicular reconstruction ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• A post-styloid mass revea...
   Price 12.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 300.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2007 o

OTOLOGY

Comparative study using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot to evaluate results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis: Results of 129 cases


Authors : Caces F, Braccini F. (Villefranche)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,1:47-53.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Aim of the study: For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. Institutions: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone. Materials and method: retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP. Statistical analysis used: variance analysis test and t-Student test (p ? 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery. Results: Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss. Comments: Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE