Home Your basket
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional septal surgery...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrent ameloblastoma o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous subcutaneous ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Persistent stapedial arte...
   Price 5.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oculo-orbital complicatio...
   Price 14.00 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Influence of phonetic con...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenomatoid hamartoma of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Bronchogenic cyst of the ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 350.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2003 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Is coincidence detection emission tomography (CDET) as reliable as positron emission tomography (PET) in head and neck cancer?


Authors : D. S. Lazard, B. Baujat, B. Barry, D. Le Guludec, P. Gehanno (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,4:207-210.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: Positron emission tomography (PET) is becoming more and more useful in head and neck tumour detection, guiding diagnostic and therapeutic decision. However, techniques, similar to PET, but using modified conventional tomography equipment, are used. The most commonly used is the dual-head positron emission tomography using coincidence detection (CDET). This study was aimed at searching if CDET could be as reliable as PET in some of its indications. Patients and methods: Between 1997 and 2001, 19 patients, with head and neck cancer, had a CDET, for 3 indications. We studied retrospectively sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) rates for these 3 indications. Results: 1°) Detection of unknown primary head and neck cancers with lymph node manifestation: Se = 100%, Sp = 66,7%. 2°) Detection of body metastasis: Se = 50%, Sp = 33%. 3°) Detection of local recurrent cancer: Se = 100 %, Sp = 25%. Conclusion: CDET seems to be useful in finding unknown primary cancers with lymph node manifestation but is not reliable to look for metastasis and local recurrences. It cannot be used in all indications for PET. If no other tool is available, this investigation can be used, keeping in mind its limitations.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE