Home Your basket
• Descriptive anatomy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Speech disorders, verbal ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: A...
   Price 5.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Rejuvenation of the eye: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• New trends in rhinoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic profiloplasty: ...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Floating stapes footplate...
   Price 12.00 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Radiofrequency inferior t...
   Price 14.00 €
• Parathyroid carcinoma: di...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Immunohistochemistry expr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrating esophageal fore...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endovascular treatment of...
   Price 12.00 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dermatofibrosarcoma protu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Type III ossiculoplasty w...
   Price 5.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual assessment of ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 325.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2013 o

PHONIATRICS

From intelligibility to comprehension, which measure­ment in practice?


Authors : Woisard V, Espesser R, Ghio A, Duez D. (Toulouse, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,1:27-33.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The modelling of the tests assessing speech disorders in touch with the international classification of the functioning implies a reflection on measurement tools. The access to the sense of the message from decoding of the signal to the action infers at the interlocutor's justifies various methods. The objec­tive of this work is to demonstrate the limit of the usual tests of intelligibility. Material and method: A population of 10 sub­jects presenting a speech disorder secondary to a Head and Neck cancer and 2 subjects controls recorded a corpus of 80 sylla­bles developed with the most frequent 16 French consonants and 5 vowels. The test of intelligibility consisted of a task of identification of consonants by a jury of 11 listeners. Results: About is the method used to estimate the informative value of the consonants tested, the uvular consonant /r/ and the nasal /n/, /m/ are very well perceived. The weighting by the rate of confusion makes tipped over the position of labio­dentales /f/, /v/ and that of / p/. The just perception of the sound /p/ would be underestimated while sounds /v/ and /f/ would be overestimated. Sounds /g/, /k/, /j/ remain the least well received. This obser­va­tion results probably from the profile of distortions produced by the selection of the population and probably from the frequency of the syllables containing these consonants in the french language for the sample of the corpus. Conclusion: The rate of confusion appears as a funda­mental element, inciting to look for more relevant methods of analysis of the results of the tests of intelligibility.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE