Home Your basket
• Surgical management of pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exploration of the swallo...
   Price 14.00 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• The application of tusso...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral cochlear implan...
   Price 5.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mucoepidermoid carcinomas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve sc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Balloon catheter dilatati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Epidermoid carcinoma of p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epitympanic osteoma of th...
   Price 12.50 €
• Giant form of infantile m...
   Price 8.50 €
• The place of the myocutan...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Velo-pharyngeal incompete...
   Price 14.00 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Influence of the relapse ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eagle’s syndrome: A case ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 10.50 €
• CT scan, MR imaging and a...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 344.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2009 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

The pedicle superficial temporalis fascial flap in oncologic reconstructive surgery of the oral cavity: How we do it and its functional results


Authors : Pons Y, Gauthier J, Pons-Ukkola E, Clément P, Conessa C. (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2009;130,4:221-224.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The authors described how they perform a pedicle superficial temporalis fascial flap in oncologic reconstructive surgery of the oral cavity and evaluated its functional results. Study design: A prospective study was performed in an university hospital from September 2001 to July 2007. Subjects and methods: Nine male patients underwent a pedicle superficial temporalis fascial flap to repair a soft tissue loss in the oral cavity following a tumour extraction (seven cases) or to repair osteoradionecrosis (two cases). Results: Twelve months after the intervention, a correct functional state was restored in seven out of nine cases and the anatomical congruence was correct in eight out of nine cases. Conclusion: The pedicle superficial temporalis fascial flap can be useful in the reconstruction of the oral cavity, especially for patients who underwent radiotherapy. This flap was shown to be reliable, with acceptable post-operative complications, though it requires surgical experience. It is of interest for posterior and/or superior oral cavity reconstruction because the flap length, which is considerably reduced by its arc of rotation and by its path near the zygomatic process, does not allow for reconstruction of the anterior floor of the mouth. Because this flap is thin, only moderate soft tissue loss can be repaired.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE