Home Your basket
• Antro choanal polyp in ch...
   Price 10.00 €
• Somatic tinnitus (review)...
   Price 12.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Description of complicati...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinitis and allergy test...
   Price 8.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• Seven cases of inverted n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role of positron emission...
   Price 15.00 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• Stuttering of the “Miror”...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Preliminary experimental ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• DROP ATTACKS revealed a ...
   Price 10.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ossiculoplasty with hydro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prognostic value of senti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 269.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2003 o

OTOLOGY

When to suspect a perilymphatic fistula?


Authors : R. Bussières, D. Portmann, P. Noyon (Québec, Bordeaux)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,4:259-264.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: The diagnosis of perilymphatic fistula (PLF) is difficult since no single clinical situation gives the diagnosis for sure. The goal of this study is to clarify the clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF. Methods: Retrospective study of 20 patients that had an exploratory tympanotomy with a PLF confirmed peroperatively. An analysis of the symptoms, signs and complementary exams was done. The surgical findings and the postoperative evolution were noted. Results: 100% of patients reported a hearing loss, 80% vertigo, 70% a tinnitus and 35% equilibrium problems. Every patient had an etiological event to explain the PLF (trauma (85%), stapedotomy (10%), other ear surgeries. Five patients had a positive fistula or Vasalva test. All patients except one had an hearing loss on the audiogram ( sensorineural, mixte or conductive). 50% had a CT scan, 70% of which were abnormal. A VNG was done on 3 patients. The sites of the PLF were as follows: 90% oval window, 5% round window and 5% both windows. The hearing got better or was stabilised in 95% of patients after the operation. 64% saw an improvement of their tinnitus and 87% of their vertigo. Conclusion: The diagnosis of PLF is difficult and a high index of suspicion is mandatory. One must look for an etiologic situation to explain the PLF. The audiogram is almost always modified, a mixte hearing loss being common due to the high incidence of ossicular trauma associated with PLF. The clinical situations where you must suspect a PLF were identified as follows: An old trauma, a recent trauma, a history of otologic surgery particularly on the stapes and a preexisting hearing loss that aggravates. A diagnosis scale to evaluate the risk of PLF, based on clinical situations, physical exam and complementary exams was done to help the clinician in the evaluation of PLF.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE