Home Your basket
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis of submandibula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Actinomycosis of the midd...
   Price 5.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Histology of the larynx....
   Price 8.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of...
   Price 5.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty conce...
   Price 14.00 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal fibrous ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma in ...
   Price 8.00 €
• Ossiculoplasty with hydro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• The tensegrity concept ap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• An original case of laryn...
   Price 8.50 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction after hemi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Epidermoid carcinoma of p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical Practice Guideli...
   Price 12.00 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 389.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2014 o

SWALLOWING

Validity of cervical auscultation in the screening for aspiration


Authors : Al Hawat A, Woisard V, Perez-Begout L, Sarrabère E, Grand S, Puech M. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,2:51-56.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: Cervical auscultation could improve the performance of bedside swallowing test to predict aspiration, especially silent aspiration. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive values of bedside swallowing test performed with and without cervical auscultation by logopedist students who had intensive training on cervical auscultation. Materials and methods: 64 patients were included in the study. They all underwent swallowing test alone, combined swallowing test and cervical auscultation, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study as defined gold standard. Two logopedist students, at the end of their training, performed the auscultation and noted their results. Results: 128 tests were performed, 96% of the tests were judged positive for aspiration. When comparing the results of the two different clinical tests, the detection of clinical signs is not improved by the addition of auscultation. Using a penetration aspiration scale threshold >5, the area under the curve measured for the swallowing test alone was significantly higher than that measured for the combined tests (p= 0.03) (0.66 for the swallowing test alone (95% CI between 0.49 and 0.83), and 0.50 for the combined tests (95% CI between 0.31 and 0.69). Conclusion: This study showed no advantage in performing cervical auscultation with bedside swallowing test. Cervical auscultation seems to hamper the assessment, mainly the perception of wet voice and laryngeal motion. These results are compatible with literature but need further confirmation using studies performed with trained logopedists.


Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE