Home Your basket
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Kikuchi Fujimoto, one cas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pre-Congress of the Ameri...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The length of the piston ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Soft palate ventilation: ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Evaluation of the efficie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Patient preference survey...
   Price 10.50 €
• Petrosal presigmoid appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic dacryocystorhi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Skull vibratory test in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 15.00 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Effect of vestibular neur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphagia, a geriatric po...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epidemiology of paediatri...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital anomalies of n...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 327.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2011 o

ONCOLOGY

Signs of upper Airways digestive tract cancers and the general practitionner. Study of the practices by a Script Test Concordance


Authors : Luft A, Pons Y. (Clamart)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,3:131-136.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Upper Airways digestive tract cancers are the 4th more frequent cancer. They are responsible for non specific symptoms. The examination of this antomical region is very difficult for a general practitioner. The precoce diagnosis of these cancers is based on the good recognition of the clinical situations by the general practitioner. The aim of this study was to test the practice of the general practitioner in front of clini­cal situations typical of head and neck cancers by a Script test concordance. Method: The study was performed on 107 pari­sian general practitioners who answered a questionnaire based on a Script Concordance Test (SCT). The SCT is a question­nai­re that test the clinical way of thinking comparing the use of an information of experts versus non experts. Results: The answers of the practitioners tested were quite in accordance with the panel of experts’ anwers. They were particularly good concerning the risk factors and the buccal and oropharyngeal cancers. The scores were lower concerning the nasopharyn­geal, laryngeal and paranasal sinuses cancers. The scores were significantly better for the most experimented practitioners. Discussion: The fact that the rhinopharygeal, the laryngeal and the paranasal sinuses cancers are less frequent and the fact that these cancers can not be seen directly during a standard physical examination of general practitioner can explain the lower scores for these types of head and neck cancers. That is why practitioners have to be particularly aware of the symp­toms and have to ask a specialized advice in case of doubt.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE