Home Your basket
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post-traumatic carotid ca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cleft palate and otitis m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Time-intensity trade of b...
   Price 10.50 €
• TRT: Results after one ye...
   Price 10.50 €
• Synovial sarcoma of the h...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute mesenteric ischemia...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 296.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2011 o

OTONEUROLOGY

Cochlear implant in elderly: Performance outcomes in the long term


Authors : Marx M, Gutierrez D, Lepage B, Khoury E, Laborde m-l, Deguine O, Fraysse B. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,4:187-191.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To study and compare the evolving capacities of speech discrimination with cochlear implants in older patients compared to patients implanted at a younger age. Metho­dology: A retrospective study comparing a group of 52 patients aged over 65 with a control group of 58 patients aged between 30 and 50 years, followed for 5 years after implantation. We analyzed and compared the evolution of speech discrimination in silence (disyllabic words, sentences) and noise (sentences, S/N ratio: +10 dB) after implantation. Results: In the group of elderly patients, the speech discrimi­na­tion in silence remains stable over time (for disyllabic words, score at 6 months: 72.8 ± 20.2%; score at 5 years: 73.7% ± 19.7). Discrimination in noise tends to improve (mean score at 6 months: 70.5% ± 21.5; score at 5 years: 76.9% ± 16.9). The results obtained are in silence are compa­ra­ble to the results of the group of patients aged between 30 and 50. In noise, their performance remains lower than the control group (mean differences between scores: -10.8; confidence interval at 95%: -17.9, -5.3). Conclusion: The cochlear implant is effective over the long term in elderly patients, for speech discrimination in quiet and in noise. In silence, their perfor­mance is comparable to younger patients with implants.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE