Home Your basket
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphagia, a geriatric po...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• A protocol for post-opera...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prosthetics gains and sat...
   Price 12.50 €
• TRT: Results after one ye...
   Price 10.50 €
• Marginal indications for ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• IPSEN Foundation meeting:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cochlear implants in chil...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• Floating stapes footplate...
   Price 12.00 €
• Descriptive anatomy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice-breaking in adolesc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vibration induced nystagm...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular-evoked myogeni...
   Price 10.50 €
• Covering of parotid and c...
   Price 14.00 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of the effects of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Inverted naso-sinus papil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma and...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 347.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE