Home Your basket
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the possibili...
   Price 8.50 €
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone anchored hearing aid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aspects of ageing on prof...
   Price 12.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Personality study in prof...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 338.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE