Home Your basket
• Subcutaneous emphysema an...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retropharyngeal abscess i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stuttering of the “Miror”...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reconstruction after tumo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the tongue:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the end...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional results of vel...
   Price 5.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical treatement by in...
   Price 12.50 €
• Transsexualism: From diag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Abscess tonsillectomy for...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epitympanic osteoma of th...
   Price 12.50 €
• Understanding the use of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Morphodynami...
   Price 10.50 €
• XVIth World Congress of O...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sarcoidosis of the thyroi...
   Price 12.50 €
• Teeth and sinuses...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cataract surgery and its ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Induction chemotherapy an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal forcing and posture...
   Price 10.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• The pedicled musculo-cuta...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anosmia following superio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Argon Plasma Coagulation ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Singular neurectomy for r...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 348.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

The domes crossover: A new method of nasal tip modifi­cation


Authors : Saban Y, Perrone F. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:185-189.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: To discuss overprojected nasal tips, to overview treatment options, and to introduce a new method of nasal tip modification. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conduced on 29 patients who underwent rhinoplasty where the domes crossover technique was employed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: 18 patients presented with homogeneous overdevelopment of the LLC (nasal tip over projection type 1), 5 patients with predominant over development of the lobular portion of the LLC (nasal tip overprojection type 2), 6 patients with a true Pinocchio-type nose and a predominant overdevelopment of the columellar portion of the LLC (nasal tip overprojection type 3). Before and after photographs were compared to evaluate nasal tip characteristics. Analysis of results was performed by the use of 3 measurements: Goode’s ratio, nasofacial angle and lobule-to-columella ratio. Results: Final nasal tip projection, rotation, volume and shape were satisfactory in all cases. No complica­tion was observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion: This new method of nasal tip modification presents the advan­tage of preserving natural domes, being quick and allowing the achievement of desirable nasal tip projection, rotation, volume and shape. Moreover according to the alar ring concept, the crossover technique preserves the continuity of the inferior cartilaginous arch and gives an excellent support to nasal tip.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE