Home Your basket
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effects of pregnancy ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal polyposis and olfac...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral endolymphatic ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear tuberculosis e...
   Price 5.50 €
• An unusual cause of neona...
   Price 5.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Characteristics of the co...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• The emergency in the mana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Giant osteoma of the maxi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed facial palsy afte...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Microsurgical reconstruct...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 256.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2006 o

RHINOLOGY

Comparison of radical (nasalisation) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study


Authors : R. Jankowski, D. Pigret, F. Decroocq, A. Blum, P. Gillet (Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,3:131-140.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To compare the 5-year outcomes of two endoscopic surgical approaches for diffuse and severe nasal polyposis. Study design: A natural experimental situation gave us the opportunity to compare the results 5 years after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalisation) (n= 39), and functional ethmoidectomy (n= 37). The two surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons on 76 consecutive patients. There was no random assignment for this retrospective study. Methods: Five years after surgery, the criteria for comparison were 1) functional results based on a questionnaire using visual analogue scales in patients free of revision surgery; 2) endoscopic and CT-scan assessments of anatomical results. The CT-scans were blinded and randomized, and opacities were measured using a computerized model; 3) the recurrence rate of nasal polyps. Results: Five years after surgery, the overall nasal functional benefit was scored 8.41 ± 0.40 (mean ± SEM) after nasalisation, and 5.69 ± 0.83 after ethmoidectomy P= 0.002) in patients free of revision surgery. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was methodically scored according to a pre-defined scale. Results were significantly better in the nasalisation group (6.03 ± 0.7 versus 3.27 ± 1.0, P= 0.02). A good correlation was found between the endoscopic and CT-scan scores (r= -0.78, P= 0.0001 for nasalisation, and r= -0.65, P= 0.001 for ethmoidectomy). The total recurrence rate was 22.7% in the nasalisation group, and 58.3% in the ethmoidectomy group (c2= 10.41, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in the treatment of nasal polyposis complete ethmoidectomy leads to better long term results than incomplete ethmoidectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE