Home Your basket
• Solitary fibrous tumor of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Massive bone dystrophic l...
   Price 5.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Giant metastasis invading...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic thyroid basi-ling...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• The application of tusso...
   Price 10.50 €
• A comparative acoustic st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal papillomatosis ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retropharyngeal abscess i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• The domes crossover: A ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after hemi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic dacryocystorhi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of tymp...
   Price 5.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined induction chemot...
   Price 10.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Minimising radiation dose...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implant in elder...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous perforation i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical procedure in fir...
   Price 8.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty: Rati...
   Price 10.00 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 697.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2007 o

OTOLOGY

Comparative study using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot to evaluate results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis: Results of 129 cases


Authors : Caces F, Braccini F. (Villefranche)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,1:47-53.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Aim of the study: For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. Institutions: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone. Materials and method: retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP. Statistical analysis used: variance analysis test and t-Student test (p ? 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery. Results: Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss. Comments: Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE