Home Your basket
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sphenochoanal polyp: Repo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Air rifle pellet injury t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audiological comparison b...
   Price 14.00 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Multi-factorial analysis ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lateral semicircular cana...
   Price 10.50 €
• Herniation of the temporo...
   Price 12.50 €
• Facial nerve monitoring i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endobronchial lipomas and...
   Price 5.50 €
• An unusual fester of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Ethmoidal metastasis reve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peptide receptor radionuc...
   Price 14.00 €
• Hearing evaluation on you...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Efficacy of nasal irrigat...
   Price 15.00 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tinnitus: first symptom o...
   Price 5.50 €
• The use of speech therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertebro and cranio veino...
   Price 14.00 €
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post-traumatic carotid ca...
   Price 8.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Going from the tube feedi...
   Price 8.50 €
• The value of the operatin...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 335.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Perceptual assessment of dysphonia: a training protocol with natural speech


Authors : Ghio A, Dufour S, Rouaze M, Bokanowski V, Pouchoulin G, Révis J, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:19-27.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: In this study, we proposed and tested the effectiveness of a training procedure on perceptual evaluation of dysphonia. Participants were naive listeners who learned to judge the severity of vocal disorders. Materials and methods: The corpus consisted of 142 female voices ranging from normal to severely dysphonic voices. A total of 38 naive listeners were tested, and the experiment was divided in 3 phases: (1) A pretest to assess the level of our listeners in the categorization of dys­pho­nia, (2) the training phase and (3) a post-test to assess the improvement associated with the training. To examine the persistence of the training, the post-test was administrated twice: Immediately after the training session and one week later. Results: Improvement in the performance between the pretest and the post-test was found for moderate and severe dysphonia. No improvement was observed in the categorization of slightly dysphonic voices, which seem the more resistant to learning. Normal voices also showed no improvement, which is likely due to the high performance on these voices during the pre-test. The improvement observed in the categorization of moderate and severe dysphonia was still present even one week after the training. Discussion: The protocol tested in this study appears to be effective and could constitute an element of training courses for speech and voice therapists. The perception of the inter­mediate levels of dysphonia, however, remains difficult to quantify and needs to be improved.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE