Home Your basket
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Massive bone dystrophic l...
   Price 5.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of submandibula...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Universal hearing screeni...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• From the physiologic perf...
   Price 14.00 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cerebrospinal fluid rhino...
   Price 12.00 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Blepharoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Extraction of the esophag...
   Price 8.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Minimising radiation dose...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• The lymphoepithelial carc...
   Price 5.50 €
• A specific plain X-ray in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Different methods in iden...
   Price 14.00 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paranasal sinus mucoceles...
   Price 14.00 €
• Determination of oesophag...
   Price 10.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• From barotrauma otitis to...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-functioning parathyro...
   Price 5.50 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 382.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE