Home Your basket
• Vestibular-evoked myogeni...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Medial displacement of T-...
   Price 8.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Dysphonia in children: Re...
   Price 12.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the parot...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Unilateral laryngeal para...
   Price 10.50 €
• Different methods in iden...
   Price 14.00 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear osteoma: A rar...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Exploration of the swallo...
   Price 14.00 €
• The rehabilitation of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Setting up a «Bonebridge»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the anterio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intrapetrous cholesteatom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of three diffe...
   Price 12.00 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• A comparative acoustic st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin in the lo...
   Price 14.00 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• The cost of running a mul...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 362.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2007 o

PHONIATRICS

The role of larynx kinesthetic feedback in speech production control


Authors : Duflo S, Ouaknine M, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2007;128,5:297-303.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: Pitch change during voice production is under the control of auditive and kinesthetic feedback phenomenona. The aim of the study was to determine the role of larynx kinesthetic feedback in speech production control. Materials and methods: To validate our laryngeal model, five porcine larynges were excised and placed on a test bench consisting of a blower and a laser photoglottometer for measurement of vocal cord vibration. We applied vibratory stimuli to the cricothyroid muscles to determine whether vibrators supplied by a generator alter the biomechanics of the larynx. Fundamental frequency (F0) was recorded under three conditions – larynx on vibration - larynx on vibration with vibrators activation - larynx on rest and vibrators activation. Once validated, 7 male and 7 female, mean age 29 years, were enrolled. Vibrators were positioned on cricothyroid muscles, cricoid and thyroid cartilages. Masking noise was used. Fundamental frequency, intensity and speech time production was measured during speech production under three conditions – normal speech, vibrators activation, and masking activation. Results: The preliminary study demonstrated that larynx on vibration with vibrators activation doesn’t alter the vocal fold F0. For the human trial, between normal speech and vibrators activation conditions, we found a significant difference (p= 0.045 for male, p= 0.010 for female) in intonation, and no significant difference for intensity and speech time. Between normal speech and masking activation conditions, no significant differences were measured for any condition. Conclusion: Use of the vibrators is a reliable method to allow the evaluation of larynx kinesthetic feedback in speech production control.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE