Home Your basket
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal mucocele...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reinforcing tympanoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Lipoma of the floor of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subcutaneous emphysema an...
   Price 5.50 €
• Endoscopic sphenoid proce...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of the cervical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• A new tongue plate for us...
   Price 5.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Posterior cranial fossa a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vocal rehabilitation with...
   Price 10.50 €
• Protruding ears...
   Price 8.50 €
• Central auditory processi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic medialization ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroid cervical haem...
   Price 8.50 €
• Going from the tube feedi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Mucoepidermoid carcinomas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinico-radiological cons...
   Price 10.50 €
• Argon Plasma Coagulation ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 314.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2006 o

ONCOLOGY

Epidermoid carcinoma of piriform sinus after chemo-radiotherapy: Acoustic evaluation and voice handicap


Authors : Dubois M. D, Crevier-Buchman L, Martin C, Prades J. M. (St-Etienne, Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,5:299-304.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: The aim of this prospective investigation was to analyse the voice and the vocal handicap for patients who received concomitant chemoradiation therapy in piriform sinus epidermoid carcinoma (T2, T3). Material and methods: This study included two males populations: Twelve patients aged from 48 to 71 years old were evaluated between 6 and 30 months after the end of chemo-radiotherapy and ten normal subjects, matched in age. The evaluation consisted in firstly a vocal recording (vowel and text) allowing an objective acoustic analysis (temporal and frequential parameters) and a perceptive evaluation of the voice quality by means of GRBAS scale. Secondly an evaluation of the quality of life by means of the voice handicap index (VHI). Results: The acoustic parameters of instability for the fundamental frequency (F0) and the maximum phonation time of the patients were statistically different (p <0.05) related to the normal subjects. On the other hand, the F0 (patients = 130 Hz, subjects = 121 Hz) as well as the speech rate (patients = 142 words/mn, subject = 148 words/mn) were not statistically different. The perspective indexes showed a deterioration of the vocal quality while the handicap expressed was minor. Conclusion: This preliminary study showed the interest of evaluations of the vocal function and the quality of life after chemo-radiotherapy for piriform sinus carcinomas allowing patients to conserve a phonation and eventually the propose a speech therapy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE