Home Your basket
• Face and neck lift using ...
   Price 14.00 €
• "Sonorous man" - an appro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice-breaking in adolesc...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Intra-orbital infected cy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Blepharoplasty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migraine, neurone and ves...
   Price 5.50 €
• Possible role of biofilm ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• Prospective study on 43 s...
   Price 10.50 €
• Paraganglioma of the cere...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ossicular reconstruction ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• A post-styloid mass revea...
   Price 12.50 €
• Early ENT manifestations ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary fibrous tumour o...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 300.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

The domes crossover: A new method of nasal tip modifi­cation


Authors : Saban Y, Perrone F. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:185-189.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objectives: To discuss overprojected nasal tips, to overview treatment options, and to introduce a new method of nasal tip modification. Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conduced on 29 patients who underwent rhinoplasty where the domes crossover technique was employed. Patients were stratified into 3 groups: 18 patients presented with homogeneous overdevelopment of the LLC (nasal tip over projection type 1), 5 patients with predominant over development of the lobular portion of the LLC (nasal tip overprojection type 2), 6 patients with a true Pinocchio-type nose and a predominant overdevelopment of the columellar portion of the LLC (nasal tip overprojection type 3). Before and after photographs were compared to evaluate nasal tip characteristics. Analysis of results was performed by the use of 3 measurements: Goode’s ratio, nasofacial angle and lobule-to-columella ratio. Results: Final nasal tip projection, rotation, volume and shape were satisfactory in all cases. No complica­tion was observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion: This new method of nasal tip modification presents the advan­tage of preserving natural domes, being quick and allowing the achievement of desirable nasal tip projection, rotation, volume and shape. Moreover according to the alar ring concept, the crossover technique preserves the continuity of the inferior cartilaginous arch and gives an excellent support to nasal tip.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE