Home Your basket
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A rare case of sarcoidosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Amphicrine adenoma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rhinolithiasis: Review ab...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical and pharyngeal i...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Silent Sinus Syndrome – T...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Psychosocial quality of l...
   Price 10.50 €
• Invasive cholesteatoma in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Objective tinnitus and es...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vestibular dysfunction af...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• One-stage surgery of midd...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 365.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands: Prognostic significance of immunohistochemestry. A study of 49 cases


Authors : Santini L, Coulibaly B, Gaudart J, Turner F, Michel J, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:183-187.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is consi­dered as the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Its prognosis is dominated by the presence of high-grade forms involving life-threatening. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry to identify the most aggressive forms and allow better discrimination between low grade, intermediate grade and high grade tumors. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 49 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Two immunohistochemical markers have mainly been studied: a marker of proliferation (Ki-67) and a growth factor receptor (EGFR). Additional analyzes were performed with other markers (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2). Statistical analy­sis investigated the existence of a correlation between the pre­sen­ce of these factors and the histopathological grade on one hand and survival of patients on the other hand. Results: Regarding the results of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and EGFR, it was observed a better survival rate when the immuno­staining was less than 10%. The expression of Ki-67 and EGFR was correlated with the histological grade, but did not, in our study, allow discrimination between low-grade, intermediate grade and high grade. Our results are consistent with data of the literature, including Ki-67, which appears to be a useful but not powerful marker of prognosis of MEC. Other markers studied (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2) showed no contri­bu­tory results. Conclusion: The prognosis of MEC is appre­ciated satisfactorily following histological criteria: histological grade, surgical margins, perineural invasion or vascular emboli. The integration of immunohistochemistry in a thera­peutic algorithm could be particularly useful for the challen­ging assessment of prognosis of intermediate grades.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE