Home Your basket
• Prosodic features of comp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pulsatile tinnitus and ve...
   Price 8.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post-traumatic carotid ca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cleft palate and otitis m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Time-intensity trade of b...
   Price 10.50 €
• TRT: Results after one ye...
   Price 10.50 €
• Synovial sarcoma of the h...
   Price 5.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute mesenteric ischemia...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment by enlargement ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction of bone de...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Esophageal foreign body: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• A single appointment with...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Type 1 tympanoplasties in...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 308.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2009 o

DYSPHAGIA

Study of the predictive value of detection tests for silent aspirations


Authors : Woisard V, Réhault E, Brouard C, Fichaux-Bourin P, Puech M, Grand S. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2009;130,1:53-60.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Screening for aspiration in patients with swallowing disorders is important in preventing complications. The tests used in this regard are insufficient due to silent aspiration relating to abnormal protective reflexes in many patients with swallowing problems. Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the predictive values of simple tests in screening for silent aspiration. Material and method: The reference test used was videofluoroscopic examination on swallowing. In the presence of aspiration (FR+) the presence (ME+) or not (ME-) of a cough of throat clearing was noted. The tests being studied were a nasal test with isotonic saline and swallowing according to a set time. Results: For screening for aspiration the presence of a “wet voice” was considered to be a sign of reduced protective reflexes. 1) During the nasal test, the results are 100% for the positive predictive value (VPp) and 83.3% for the negative predictive value (VPn); 2) These results are respectively 84.6% and 35.9% during the swallowing test. Regarding screening for silent aspiration, 1) during the nasal test, the results are 62.5% for the positive predictive value (VPp) and 36.3% for the negative predictive value (VPn); 2) These results are respectively 54.5% and 26.6% during the swallowing test. Conclusion: This preliminary study points out the lack of predictive value of the nasal test and the swallow test for the silent aspirations. However the results could be useful for other researchers developping other tests in this area.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE