Home Your basket
• Myringoplasties for anter...
   Price 10.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Paediatric airway endosco...
   Price 5.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cat scratch disease: A di...
   Price 8.50 €
• Clinical and histopatholo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Middle ear adenoma / carc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the parot...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparative results of ty...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pathophysiology, assessme...
   Price 12.50 €
• Improving quality of life...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Voice handicap evaluation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Pott’s puffy tumour, rare...
   Price 8.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty conce...
   Price 14.00 €
• Active bone conduction im...
   Price 12.00 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ruptured pexis after supr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute mesenteric ischemia...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroid cervical haem...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bronchoscopic findings in...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Paranasal sinus mucoceles...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 351.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2005 o

OTOLOGY

Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid


Authors : M. Niewiarowicz, O. Stieler (Poznan)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,2:75-80.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The aim of investigations was to compare the perception of the pitch of tonal signals by patients using both the cochlear implant and hearing aid. Material and method: The subjective evaluation of the pitch of sound presented through classical acoustic amplification and perceived by the residual hearing was compared with the sound perceived as a result of an electric stimulation. The subjects were 6 patients aged 15-63 (mean 38), diagnosed with postlingual deafness. The comparison of the acoustic signal transmitted via the hearing aid (in the acoustic free field) with the electrical signal from stimulated electrode of the cochlear implant enabled to determine subjectively evaluated shift in the frequency domain. The tonotopic distribution according to the Greenwood’s model compared with the allocation of frequency determined on the basis of cochlear view was also investigated. Results and conclusion: The study has revealed significant differences in the perception of the pitch of sounds perceived through the acoustic stimulation via the hearing aid and the electric stimulation via the implant.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE