Home Your basket
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for su...
   Price 15.00 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The eye movement autophon...
   Price 14.00 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Type III ossiculoplasty w...
   Price 5.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• A non-linear model of lar...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multi-factorial analysis ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculous acute mastoid...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral latero-pontine ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prosthetics gains and sat...
   Price 12.50 €
• The benefit of phoniatric...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnostic value of vibra...
   Price 8.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migrating hypopharyngeal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal septal abscess: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Velo-pharyngeal incompete...
   Price 14.00 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Personal experience about...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Functional comparison of ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• Study of the predictive v...
   Price 10.50 €
• F0 characteristics in Par...
   Price 12.00 €
• Post intubation collected...
   Price 8.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 367.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2005 o

PHONIATRICS

Determination of oesophageal speech intelligibility with an articulation assessment


Authors : M. Azzarello, B. Amy de la Bretèque, R. Garrel, A. Giovanni (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2005;126,5:327-334.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: We studied if articulation could determine esophageal speech’s intelligibility. Material and method: To do so, we proposed 30 subjects distributed in three groups based on their speech proficiency level, two preliminary assessments: an articulation assessment and an intelligibility assessment. Results: The study shows a significantly high correlation (86%) between the results of the articulation assessment and the intelligibility assessment in the whole of group studied. However, we noted differences in correlations according to the level of the subjects: in the novices’ group, the percentage reaches 62%, in the medium group, 76%, and in the proficient one: 97%. Conclusion: We concluded that if the results of the articulation assessment is very high, intelligibility will be good. On the other hand, if this percentage is moderate, we can’t evaluate intelligibility only with the articulation factor.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE