Home Your basket
• Vocal rehabilitation with...
   Price 10.50 €
• Peritonsillar abscess: Is...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the efficie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Autistic like behaviour d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Marginal indications for ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Modern lipostructure: The...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic ligation of th...
   Price 12.00 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty conce...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study on the modeling of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• International Conference ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Develop­ment of an osteos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical treatement by in...
   Price 12.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hygiene and sterilisation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Transverse maxillary defi...
   Price 8.50 €
• When some clinical cases ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear overpressure w...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatment and rehabilitat...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 8.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Lifting of the oval face ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Defects in accuracy of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Atelectasis of the maxill...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• The jugulotympanic paraga...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing results in stapes...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 348.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2004 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Voice after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Comparison of two phonatory mechanisms.


Authors : V. Woisard, A. Rollet, M. Puech, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,5:319-324.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Different laryngeal phonatory mechanisms may be observed at long term after supracricoid laryngectomy. For this study two mechanisms are differentiated. The «dilated» mechanism is the consequence of a forward movement of the neolarynx creating a new resonance cavity. The «contracted» mechanism tallies with the backward contraction of the base of the tongue and the contraction of the posterior pharyngeal wall compressing the neolarynx. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine if the voice outcome is different between these two kinds of mechanisms. Material and method: The method is based on the selection of a homogeneous group: 12 patients operated by cricoepiglottopexy with a follow up superior to two years and with a stable voice and a full neoglottic closure during phonation. The voice quality and the phonatory mechanism are analysed. Regarding voice assessment, a self evaluation with the vocal handicap index adapted for the study and the GRBAS scale are carried-out. Frequency (usual, minimum, maximum, range) and loudness are used to appreciate the vocal capacities. The phonatory mechanism is studied by videolaryngostroboscopy, performed tongue free, with a normal /e/ and a high-low transition pitch. Results: The outcomes point out a difference between the two mechanisms. The best vocal results are observed in the «dilated» mechanism for the studied parameters and mainly for the frequency parameters. Conclusion: The discovery of numerous phonatory mechanisms after supracricoid laryngectomy independent from neoglottic closure lead us to further studies of the impact of this type of surgery on articulatory patterns.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE