Home Your basket
• Fistulisation of a tuberc...
   Price 5.50 €
• Esthesioneuroblastoma....
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Training strategies of th...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the superio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital decompression in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rehabilitation strategies...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial aesthetic lipostru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• These lesions of the voca...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Simple management of the ...
   Price 12.00 €
• A comparative study of br...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• The effects of pregnancy ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Congenital absence of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 8.50 €
• The length of the piston ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Validation of a clinical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Patient preference survey...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cataract surgery and its ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannomas...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cochlear implantation in ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Medicamentous toxic heari...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complicated fungal sinusi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Choanal atresia : a retro...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis....
   Price 8.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dehiscence of the anterio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Carotid body paragangliom...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional results of vel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: A...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of a dysphonic...
   Price 10.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Larynx manipulation....
   Price 5.50 €
• Stuttering of the “Miror”...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ossiculoplasty with hydro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction of a trans...
   Price 8.50 €
• Predictive factors for su...
   Price 15.00 €
• Saddle nose surgery: Long...
   Price 10.50 €
• Medial displacement of T-...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid papillary microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Zenker's diverticulum: Te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occupational therapy in t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of the otology ...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 686.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2014 o

SWALLOWING

Validity of cervical auscultation in the screening for aspiration


Authors : Al Hawat A, Woisard V, Perez-Begout L, Sarrabère E, Grand S, Puech M. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2014;135,2:51-56.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Introduction: Cervical auscultation could improve the performance of bedside swallowing test to predict aspiration, especially silent aspiration. The aim of this study is to compare the predictive values of bedside swallowing test performed with and without cervical auscultation by logopedist students who had intensive training on cervical auscultation. Materials and methods: 64 patients were included in the study. They all underwent swallowing test alone, combined swallowing test and cervical auscultation, and videofluoroscopic swallowing study as defined gold standard. Two logopedist students, at the end of their training, performed the auscultation and noted their results. Results: 128 tests were performed, 96% of the tests were judged positive for aspiration. When comparing the results of the two different clinical tests, the detection of clinical signs is not improved by the addition of auscultation. Using a penetration aspiration scale threshold >5, the area under the curve measured for the swallowing test alone was significantly higher than that measured for the combined tests (p= 0.03) (0.66 for the swallowing test alone (95% CI between 0.49 and 0.83), and 0.50 for the combined tests (95% CI between 0.31 and 0.69). Conclusion: This study showed no advantage in performing cervical auscultation with bedside swallowing test. Cervical auscultation seems to hamper the assessment, mainly the perception of wet voice and laryngeal motion. These results are compatible with literature but need further confirmation using studies performed with trained logopedists.


Price : 12.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE