Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Construction and validati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed labyrinthine fist...
   Price 10.50 €
• Learning curve in sialend...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• IPSEN Foundation meeting:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endobronchial lipomas and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Correlation between laryn...
   Price 10.50 €
• The «intra-cordal polyp»:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 365.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE