Home Your basket
• Dermatofibrosarcoma protu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Occupational therapy in t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Thyroid tuberculosis asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otosclerosis among patien...
   Price 10.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Allergic rhinitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical cystic lymphangi...
   Price 5.50 €
• The importance of the sta...
   Price 5.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Congenital nasal pyriform...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Temporal lift...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Airbag and hearing loss: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of the chest CT ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The verrucous laryngeal c...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 223.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2006 o

RHINOLOGY

Comparison of radical (nasalisation) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study


Authors : R. Jankowski, D. Pigret, F. Decroocq, A. Blum, P. Gillet (Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,3:131-140.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To compare the 5-year outcomes of two endoscopic surgical approaches for diffuse and severe nasal polyposis. Study design: A natural experimental situation gave us the opportunity to compare the results 5 years after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalisation) (n= 39), and functional ethmoidectomy (n= 37). The two surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons on 76 consecutive patients. There was no random assignment for this retrospective study. Methods: Five years after surgery, the criteria for comparison were 1) functional results based on a questionnaire using visual analogue scales in patients free of revision surgery; 2) endoscopic and CT-scan assessments of anatomical results. The CT-scans were blinded and randomized, and opacities were measured using a computerized model; 3) the recurrence rate of nasal polyps. Results: Five years after surgery, the overall nasal functional benefit was scored 8.41 ± 0.40 (mean ± SEM) after nasalisation, and 5.69 ± 0.83 after ethmoidectomy P= 0.002) in patients free of revision surgery. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was methodically scored according to a pre-defined scale. Results were significantly better in the nasalisation group (6.03 ± 0.7 versus 3.27 ± 1.0, P= 0.02). A good correlation was found between the endoscopic and CT-scan scores (r= -0.78, P= 0.0001 for nasalisation, and r= -0.65, P= 0.001 for ethmoidectomy). The total recurrence rate was 22.7% in the nasalisation group, and 58.3% in the ethmoidectomy group (c2= 10.41, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in the treatment of nasal polyposis complete ethmoidectomy leads to better long term results than incomplete ethmoidectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE