Home Your basket
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the possibili...
   Price 8.50 €
• Desmoplastic ameloblastom...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bone anchored hearing aid...
   Price 8.50 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aspects of ageing on prof...
   Price 12.00 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial allotransplantati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction of the ant...
   Price 8.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Idiopathic sudden deafnes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Efficacy of voice therapy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Enlarged marginal incisio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Study of tongue pressure ...
   Price 12.00 €
• Personality study in prof...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acoustic neuroma surgery....
   Price 10.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 333.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2015 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Value of the preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction


Authors : Cortese S, Phulpin B, Mastronicola R, Gangloff P, Guillet J, Roch M, Julien L, Verhaeghe JL, Dolivet G. (Vandœuvre les Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2015;136,2:61-66.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Background: Reconstruction of the mandible with micro­vascularized fibula transplants is actually a well-established procedure, yet the major component is the limited diameter of the diaphysis that can induce oral rehabilitation’s failure, especially in dentate patients. In this paper, we report our surgi­cal procedure allowing preservation of the mandibular height. The primary objective was to assess aesthetic and func­tional improvements of preservation of an osseous mandibular rim with a fibula free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods: Five patients (all males, mean age of 60 years) were treated with this method. Aetiologies were tumour in 3 cases, and osteo­radionecrosis in the two others cases. We described all step of our surgical procedure and the functional, aesthetic and carcinologic results were evaluated. The follow up varies from 6 to 30 months. Results: One patient died at 12 days from unre­la­ted affection. For the other patients, both the aesthetics and functional outcomes were better than in case of mandibular interruption surgery. In fact, the mandibular contour of the mandibule was preserved and the height of mandible was restored. One patient is in progress of dental rehabilitation with osseous implants. Carcinologically, no local recurrence was observed. Conclusion: This technique is reliable and enables to optimize oral rehabilitation with endosteal implants. Nevertheless, we consider that the 3D scanner is essential before the intervention to evaluate the osseous reach. Moreover, if necessarily the procedure can be modified intraoperatively.

Price : 14.00 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE