Home Your basket
• Pneumatization (concha bu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Singular neurectomy for r...
   Price 12.00 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice after supracricoid ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid carcino...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• The place of the myocutan...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sacrifice was an art: The...
   Price 8.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cat scratch disease: A di...
   Price 8.50 €
• Myringoplasties for anter...
   Price 10.50 €
• ENT localisation of amylo...
   Price 15.00 €
• Vocal rehabilitation with...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic medialization ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrent ameloblastoma o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Outcome of surgical and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• From the physiologic perf...
   Price 14.00 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Dysphonia and cervical hy...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• Quality of life evaluatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of swallowing ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Late metastasis from rena...
   Price 8.50 €
• Forcing the voice : the c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otolaryngological aspects...
   Price 8.50 €
• Toxic nodular goitre asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnosis and treatment o...
   Price 10.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Going from the tube feedi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of submandibula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Temporal lift...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cholesteatoma by osteoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hearing evaluation on you...
   Price 8.50 €
• Myasthenia gravis and oro...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical approach to a li...
   Price 8.00 €

Total Order 437.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2011 o

PHONIATRICS

Context influence on the perception of dysphonia: when the knowledge of the patient’s clinical state can modify the results of perceptual voice quality assess­ment


Authors : Ghio A, Merienne S, Giovanni A. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,1:9-17.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Two experiments were conducted to examine how knowledge of the patient’s clinical state affects the results of perceptual voice quality assessment performed by specialists in voice therapy. This study involved 53 patients with a dysphonia. For each speaker, we selected a pair of recordings made in different circumstances. These pairs of voices were presented to seven listeners (ENT surgeons or speech therapists). The task was to perceptually compare the severity of the dysphonia between the 2 recordings of the pair. Stimuli were presented first in a blind test, then several weeks later with accompanying information about the patient; in particular, whether the voice was pre- or post- treatment was explicitly specified. We balanced this artificial contextual information in order to (α) reinforce the blind judgment (for example, voices perceived as better in the blind test were indicated as post treatment); (β) be inconsistent (in a clinical point of view) compared to the blind test (for example, voices perceived as more disordered during the blind test were indicated as post treatment). Results revealed that in the clinical-consistent context α, the preference was amplified in a significant way. In clinical-inconsistent condition β, we observed an inhibition effect or a change of decision. In this condi­tion, the judgment was more dependant on the contextual information (pre/post treatment) than on the auditory sensation obtained in blind condition. These findings are discussed with reference to results in the literature on visual, olfactory or audi­tory perception in context. In the frame of perceptual voice assess­ment, results revealed that only blind tests can provide reliable results.


Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE