Home Your basket
• The neurotologic evaluati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post-traumatic otoscleros...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anosmia following superio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Neurofibromatosis Type1 r...
   Price 8.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Papillary thyroid microca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• A retrospective study of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Today’s importance of ult...
   Price 14.00 €
• Study of the platysma col...
   Price 10.50 €
• Soft palate ventilation: ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Sarcomatoid carcinomas of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal foreign b...
   Price 8.50 €
• Extraction of the esophag...
   Price 8.50 €
• Paraganglioma of the cere...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for su...
   Price 15.00 €
• Transverse maxillary defi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• The relevance of Choukrou...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Microdebrider-assisted pa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Postural study on healthy...
   Price 10.50 €
• The rehabilitation of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the parot...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pure sensorineural hearin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adult laryngeal cavernous...
   Price 5.50 €
• Reliability of CT-Scan in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Voice Handicap Index adap...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 357.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2013 o

PLASTIC SURGERY

Aesthetic augmentation of the dorsum, mid-term results


Authors : Winter C, Gerbault O, Kestemont P, Castillo L. (Nice)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2013;134,4:179-184.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Purpose of the study: Dorsum aesthetic augmentation can be divided according to their objective, total and partial increa­se or camouflage. The objective of this original article is to define the valid techniques in each indication through a cohort study, clinical cases, and current data from the lite­ra­ture. Patient and method: lt is a monocentric mono operator retrospec­tive study from 2005 to 2010 included. On 171 rhino­plasties, 57 were augmentation rhinoplasties of which 40 were of interest to the dorsum. Excluded patients were bone grafts, lost and one patient operated on a active Wegener desease. Thus 26 rhinoplasties were analyzed by an indepen­dent obser­ver. Results: All grafts confused there were 11.5% of resorption which corresponds to the data from the literature, 17% of resorption in the camouflage indications and 7% in augmen­ta­tion, as well as a higher resorption for crushed cartilage (33%) rate. There was more mobility in augmentation (28%) than in the camouflage (8%) and greater visibility of the banks of the graft in augmentation (35%) compared to the camouflage (8%). Conclusion: In the mild to severe saddle nose, the DCF is greater than cartilage monobloc or crushed in terms of stability and visibility, its indications could be expanded to harmoni­sa­tion. Camouflage crushed cartilage is not sustainable and the temporal aponeurosis could it be preferred. Resorbable fillers can offer an alternative to surgery or improve its results.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE