Home Your basket
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Newborn and infant nasal ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Pharyngolaryngectomy for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sphenochoanal polyp: Repo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculous otomastoiditi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervico facial lymphangio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral vestibular loss...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rare benin tumors of the ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Different clinical approa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Carcinogenesis of the eth...
   Price 10.50 €
• Frontal sinus osteoma com...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma presenting ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Prospective evaluation of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Solitary myofibroma of th...
   Price 5.50 €
• Congenital cyst and fistu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of labial inco...
   Price 10.50 €
• A sphenoidal mucocele wit...
   Price 8.50 €
• Is coincidence detection ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical liposuction: A r...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of hypnotherapy ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual evaluation of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The monaural pseudo-stere...
   Price 8.50 €
• The subjective visual ver...
   Price 10.50 €
• Modified butterfly cartil...
   Price 10.50 €
• Communication disorders m...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Teeth and sinuses...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 306.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2006 o

OTONEUROLOGY

The neurotologic evaluation of vestibular schwannomas. Results of audiological and vestibular testing in 100 consecutive cases.


Authors : B. K. Diallo, V. Franco-Vidal, D. Vasili, M. Négrevergne, P. Darrouzet, R. Diouf, V. Darrouzet (Bordeaux)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,4:203-209.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To determine the results and sensitivity of a comprehensive audiological and vestibular work-up in patients presenting with vestibular schwannoma (VS). Material and Methods: One hundred consecutive cases of VS diagnosed from January 2004 to May 2005 were prospectively studied. The tumour size was classified according to Koos classification and hearing was assessed according to the five-stage classification from the Tokyo consensus. A comprehensive work-up was conducted in all patients, including pure tone and speech audiometry, Brainstem Evoked Audiologic Potentials (BEAP) assessment, Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP) examination and bithermal caloric testing using videonystagmography, on both sides. BEAP responses were considered as normal or endocochlear when interwave intervals were normal, absent because of poor hearing or retrocochlear when wave 1 to 5 interval > 4.3 ms and/or when this interval was greater than > 0.25 ms between sides, or when no response was recorded when hearing was preserved. VEMP were considered as normal absent or diminished (amplitude < 50%, as compared with contralateral). Caloric responses were considered normal, reduced (reduced by ? 30%) absent (reduced by > 80%). Results: Fifty-six women and 44 men were examined (mean age 57.8 years). Left and right side were equally affected. Vertigo, tinnitus and hearing loss were the main presenting symptom in 21%, 32% and 68% of the cases, respectively. Eighty-two per cent were operated, 17% simply monitored and 1% irradiated. The tumours were Stage 1, 2, 3 and 4 in 14%, 28%, 21% and 37%, respectively. Hearing was class A in 9%, Class B in 34%, Class C in 14% and Class E-D in 43% of the cases. Globally, BEAP showed a retrocochlear pattern in 64% of the cases and no response in 30%. Abnormal responses of VEMP were observed in 94% of the cases. Caloric testing was abnormal in 61% and normal in 11%. Responses could not be analyzed in 28% of patients. Only one patient showed normal responses to the whole work-up (99% sensitivity). This patient had a small intrameatal tumour and actually complained of contralateral symptoms. Conclusion: The results suggest that a full audiovestibular assessment can help diagnose VS of all sizes. But false-negative results remain possible in small intrameatal tumours (1%). In addition it can give useful postoperative prognostic information.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE