Home Your basket
• Fungal sinusitis: Report ...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of peri-operativ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Induction chemotherapy an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perceptual assessment of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Gastro-oesophageal reflux...
   Price 8.50 €
• Migrating esophageal fore...
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Artistic anatomy of the n...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vertical extended hemi cr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Active bone conduction im...
   Price 12.00 €
• Exophthalmos arising from...
   Price 10.50 €
• Autologous bone pate in m...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otologic surgery in HIV-i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Research in cancer : adva...
   Price 5.50 €
• Signs of upper Airways di...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical exploration of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• External versus endoscopi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vestibular neuritis: aeti...
   Price 8.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of instrumental vocal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 278.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 2 - 2012 o

OTOLOGY

Deafness in adults. Study of practices in general medicine


Authors : Leveque P, Kossowski M, Pons Y. (Clamart)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,2:59-66.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Deafness is a sensory disability responsible for communication disorder, sometimes impairing social life. In children, the hearing is an important concern for all stake­holders in early childhood (systematic neonatal screening, etc.). On the other hand, in the adult, it is rarely tested, and patients do consult when their audiometric status is already badly impaired. But their care is all the better if the deafness diagnosis is made early, as for the audio-prosthetic rehabi­li­ta­tion for example. Today, the general practitioner is the first link of the diagnostic and therapeutic management chain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic practices of practitioners in front of deafness in adults. Subjects and methods: This prospective study included 74 practitioners ba­sed in “Ile de France” interviewed using a multiple choice ques­­tion­naire (MCQ) on otoscopic and audiometric diagnostics and a Script Concordance test (SC) on clinical adult deafness situa­tions validated by a 5 experts panel. Results: The obtained average score was 66.35% of correct answers to the MCQ and 47.76% to the SC. Conclusions: In our study, the surveyed practitioners showed a good level of otoscopic and audiometric diagnosis in the MCQ. However, their answers were not concor­dant with those of the expert panel in the SC. They have been particularly poorly performing on issues related to func­tional signs and their use in a given clinical situation, often driving to establish an otoscopic misdiagnosis while their diagnostic recognition of a pathological eardrum in the MCQ was rather good. These results reflect a lack of confidence in their otoscopic diagnosis related to the lack of knowledge of the causes of deafness in adults and their symptoms.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE