Home Your basket
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Orbital apex syndrome fol...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cholesterol granuloma of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Monolingualism, an overlo...
   Price 5.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual case of intrat...
   Price 5.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal involvement in Croh...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis....
   Price 8.50 €
• Tumours of the accessory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The cholesteatomatous rin...
   Price 5.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €
• Results of six years expe...
   Price 8.50 €
• Perceptual assessment of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Seven cases of inverted n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Objective analysis of pos...
   Price 8.50 €
• Two cases of primary mali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cholesteatoma presenting ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interest of MIBI scintigr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cranial fasciitis of chil...
   Price 8.50 €
• Augmentation of the abdom...
   Price 10.50 €
• Auditory screening in neo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Static management of lago...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 5.50 €
• Orbital Kimura’s disease:...
   Price 14.00 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 278.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands: Prognostic significance of immunohistochemestry. A study of 49 cases


Authors : Santini L, Coulibaly B, Gaudart J, Turner F, Michel J, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:183-187.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is consi­dered as the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Its prognosis is dominated by the presence of high-grade forms involving life-threatening. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry to identify the most aggressive forms and allow better discrimination between low grade, intermediate grade and high grade tumors. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 49 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Two immunohistochemical markers have mainly been studied: a marker of proliferation (Ki-67) and a growth factor receptor (EGFR). Additional analyzes were performed with other markers (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2). Statistical analy­sis investigated the existence of a correlation between the pre­sen­ce of these factors and the histopathological grade on one hand and survival of patients on the other hand. Results: Regarding the results of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and EGFR, it was observed a better survival rate when the immuno­staining was less than 10%. The expression of Ki-67 and EGFR was correlated with the histological grade, but did not, in our study, allow discrimination between low-grade, intermediate grade and high grade. Our results are consistent with data of the literature, including Ki-67, which appears to be a useful but not powerful marker of prognosis of MEC. Other markers studied (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2) showed no contri­bu­tory results. Conclusion: The prognosis of MEC is appre­ciated satisfactorily following histological criteria: histological grade, surgical margins, perineural invasion or vascular emboli. The integration of immunohistochemistry in a thera­peutic algorithm could be particularly useful for the challen­ging assessment of prognosis of intermediate grades.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE