Home Your basket
• Evolution of the otology ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Evaluation of vocal abuse...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• «Mini-rhinoplasty»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Is HIV/AIDS an independen...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cephalic vein access for ...
   Price 10.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Benign positional vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• «Less is more»: A new con...
   Price 14.00 €
• Callas or the trajectory ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Primary nasal tuberculosi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tonsillitis tuberculous s...
   Price 8.50 €
• Immunohistochemistry expr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Active bone conduction im...
   Price 12.00 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• How I do it: Salivary duc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of free-flap f...
   Price 14.00 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hyperglycemia after intra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis....
   Price 8.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sarcoidosis of the thyroi...
   Price 12.50 €
• Cytokines profile in cyst...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validity of cervical ausc...
   Price 12.00 €
• CT scan, MR imaging and a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acute infectious complica...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Difficult blepharoplastie...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic thyroid: A report...
   Price 8.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Primary sub-mandibular gl...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 389.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2012 o

SALIVARY GLANDS

Mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands: Prognostic significance of immunohistochemestry. A study of 49 cases


Authors : Santini L, Coulibaly B, Gaudart J, Turner F, Michel J, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. (Marseille)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,4:183-187.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is consi­dered as the most common malignant salivary gland tumor. Its prognosis is dominated by the presence of high-grade forms involving life-threatening. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry to identify the most aggressive forms and allow better discrimination between low grade, intermediate grade and high grade tumors. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 49 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinomas of salivary glands. Two immunohistochemical markers have mainly been studied: a marker of proliferation (Ki-67) and a growth factor receptor (EGFR). Additional analyzes were performed with other markers (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2). Statistical analy­sis investigated the existence of a correlation between the pre­sen­ce of these factors and the histopathological grade on one hand and survival of patients on the other hand. Results: Regarding the results of immunohistochemical Ki-67 and EGFR, it was observed a better survival rate when the immuno­staining was less than 10%. The expression of Ki-67 and EGFR was correlated with the histological grade, but did not, in our study, allow discrimination between low-grade, intermediate grade and high grade. Our results are consistent with data of the literature, including Ki-67, which appears to be a useful but not powerful marker of prognosis of MEC. Other markers studied (p53, ACE, bcl2, CD 117 and her2) showed no contri­bu­tory results. Conclusion: The prognosis of MEC is appre­ciated satisfactorily following histological criteria: histological grade, surgical margins, perineural invasion or vascular emboli. The integration of immunohistochemistry in a thera­peutic algorithm could be particularly useful for the challen­ging assessment of prognosis of intermediate grades.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE