Home Your basket
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Functional septal surgery...
   Price 10.50 €
• Metastatic melanoma to th...
   Price 5.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oto-rhino-laryngology and...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Planned reconstruction af...
   Price 8.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Recurrent ameloblastoma o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous subcutaneous ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hypersensitivity to inhal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Persistent stapedial arte...
   Price 5.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Usher type I syndrome in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic analysis of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Oculo-orbital complicatio...
   Price 14.00 €
• Supra and infra hyoid mid...
   Price 10.50 €
• A rare tumor of the parap...
   Price 5.50 €
• Influence of phonetic con...
   Price 10.50 €
• Quality of life after oro...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid oncocytomas....
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenocarcinoma of the eth...
   Price 8.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adenomatoid hamartoma of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Isolated tracheo-œsophage...
   Price 5.50 €
• Contribution to anatomica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Botulinum toxin, descript...
   Price 12.50 €

Total Order 339.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2011 o

OTONEUROLOGY

Cochlear implant in elderly: Performance outcomes in the long term


Authors : Marx M, Gutierrez D, Lepage B, Khoury E, Laborde m-l, Deguine O, Fraysse B. (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2011;132,4:187-191.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objectives: To study and compare the evolving capacities of speech discrimination with cochlear implants in older patients compared to patients implanted at a younger age. Metho­dology: A retrospective study comparing a group of 52 patients aged over 65 with a control group of 58 patients aged between 30 and 50 years, followed for 5 years after implantation. We analyzed and compared the evolution of speech discrimination in silence (disyllabic words, sentences) and noise (sentences, S/N ratio: +10 dB) after implantation. Results: In the group of elderly patients, the speech discrimi­na­tion in silence remains stable over time (for disyllabic words, score at 6 months: 72.8 ± 20.2%; score at 5 years: 73.7% ± 19.7). Discrimination in noise tends to improve (mean score at 6 months: 70.5% ± 21.5; score at 5 years: 76.9% ± 16.9). The results obtained are in silence are compa­ra­ble to the results of the group of patients aged between 30 and 50. In noise, their performance remains lower than the control group (mean differences between scores: -10.8; confidence interval at 95%: -17.9, -5.3). Conclusion: The cochlear implant is effective over the long term in elderly patients, for speech discrimination in quiet and in noise. In silence, their perfor­mance is comparable to younger patients with implants.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE