Home Your basket
• Moderate leukocyte infilt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tonsillitis tuberculous s...
   Price 8.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Exploration of the otolit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• The place of anti-viral i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Amphicrine adenoma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• Implications of multiling...
   Price 12.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acceptability of topical ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Transgender voice and com...
   Price 12.00 €
• Is it possible to evolve ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Pathophysiology of choles...
   Price 10.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal sarcoidosis: Ca...
   Price 5.50 €
• Allergic and pneumologic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endoscopic endonasal surg...
   Price 8.50 €
• «Mini-rhinoplasty»...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parapharyngeal lymph node...
   Price 8.50 €
• Combined induction chemot...
   Price 10.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fistula of the fourth bra...
   Price 5.50 €
• A histopathologic evaluat...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Thyroid differenciated ca...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hyperglycemia after intra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bilateral paranasal sinus...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aspects of ageing on prof...
   Price 12.00 €
• Formant structures of vow...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve sc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aneurysmal bone cyst of t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Schwannomas of the neck. ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Polypose nasosinusienne a...
   Price 15.00 €
• Evaluation of the presenc...
   Price 12.50 €
• The effects of treatments...
   Price 14.00 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 5.50 €
• Early education for child...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal polyposis: long ter...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prosody and reading: Temp...
   Price 12.00 €

Total Order 395.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2003 o

HEAD AND NECK CARCINOLOGY

Is coincidence detection emission tomography (CDET) as reliable as positron emission tomography (PET) in head and neck cancer?


Authors : D. S. Lazard, B. Baujat, B. Barry, D. Le Guludec, P. Gehanno (Paris)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2003;124,4:207-210.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: Positron emission tomography (PET) is becoming more and more useful in head and neck tumour detection, guiding diagnostic and therapeutic decision. However, techniques, similar to PET, but using modified conventional tomography equipment, are used. The most commonly used is the dual-head positron emission tomography using coincidence detection (CDET). This study was aimed at searching if CDET could be as reliable as PET in some of its indications. Patients and methods: Between 1997 and 2001, 19 patients, with head and neck cancer, had a CDET, for 3 indications. We studied retrospectively sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) rates for these 3 indications. Results: 1°) Detection of unknown primary head and neck cancers with lymph node manifestation: Se = 100%, Sp = 66,7%. 2°) Detection of body metastasis: Se = 50%, Sp = 33%. 3°) Detection of local recurrent cancer: Se = 100 %, Sp = 25%. Conclusion: CDET seems to be useful in finding unknown primary cancers with lymph node manifestation but is not reliable to look for metastasis and local recurrences. It cannot be used in all indications for PET. If no other tool is available, this investigation can be used, keeping in mind its limitations.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE