Home Your basket
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Laryngeal tuberculosis: A...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of peritonsill...
   Price 5.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Otogenic pneumocephalus: ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Diagnostic value of vibra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Parapharyngeal tumours: M...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid surgery (356 case...
   Price 10.50 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Anatomic evaluation of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• Teeth and sinuses...
   Price 8.50 €
• Aspects of voice quality ...
   Price 5.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Velo-pharyngeal incompete...
   Price 14.00 €
• Karapandzic flap for reco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Adaptation and validation...
   Price 10.50 €
• How I do it: Salivary duc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Positioning in the oropha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of a huge amel...
   Price 5.50 €
• Free sorting task of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Perilymphatic Gusher as a...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implication of mitochondr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 10.50 €
• The European Evaluation o...
   Price 8.50 €
• Peritonsillar abscess: Is...
   Price 10.50 €
• Electrorhinomanometric ev...
   Price 10.50 €
• Objective tinnitus and es...
   Price 5.50 €
• Vocal and behavioral adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Parathyroïd adenoma induc...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparison of radical (na...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prognostic value of senti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing preservation in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side effects and patients...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 404.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE