Home Your basket
• Understanding the use of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cine-MRI contribution to ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical management of ma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnosis of non organic ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Singular neurectomy for r...
   Price 12.00 €
• Hearing results in stapes...
   Price 10.50 €
• Skull vibratory test in p...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical surgical emphyse...
   Price 5.50 €
• Improving quality of life...
   Price 12.00 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Treatments of hereditary ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cat scratch disease: A di...
   Price 8.50 €
• Adenoid cystic carcinoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• Therapeutic education of ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Velo-pharyngeal incompete...
   Price 14.00 €
• Failure rate and revision...
   Price 10.50 €
• The outcome of treatments...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epidermoid carcinoma of p...
   Price 10.50 €
• An unusual fester of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Failure to regain full fu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Changing patterns of bucc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Air rifle pellet injury t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Submental flap for auricu...
   Price 8.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early PTH assay after tot...
   Price 10.50 €
• Life after total laryngec...
   Price 8.50 €
• Chronic laryngitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Interest of the cervical ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Epistaxis and hospitalisa...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diagnosis of submandibula...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• From intelligibility to c...
   Price 10.50 €
• Management of cervical ce...
   Price 10.50 €
• Videonystagmography and v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing aid : practical a...
   Price 8.50 €
• Sinonasal hemangiopericyt...
   Price 10.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• Using the superficial tem...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Universal hearing screeni...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benefit of skull vibratio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Bronchogenic cyst of the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Does indermil glue improv...
   Price 5.50 €
• Study of the supra-glotti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Predictive factors for re...
   Price 14.00 €
• Inflammatory pathology an...
   Price 10.50 €
• Voice related quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Liposarcoma of the hypoph...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sentinel lymph node biops...
   Price 15.00 €
• Type 1 tympanoplasties in...
   Price 12.00 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Innovations in interventi...
   Price 15.00 €
• Thyroid tuberculosis asso...
   Price 5.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal vertigo...
   Price 8.50 €
• Hygiene and sterilisation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Side-to-end hypoglossal-f...
   Price 10.50 €
• Treating vertigo with ves...
   Price 10.50 €
• "Bamboo nodes" : a clinic...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical treatement by in...
   Price 12.50 €
• Transoral surgical treatm...
   Price 8.50 €
• A new look on septoplasti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial nerve monitoring d...
   Price 12.50 €
• Evolution of voice assess...
   Price 10.50 €
• A study of peristomal rec...
   Price 5.50 €
• Voice prostheses: long-te...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stuttering of the “Miror”...
   Price 5.50 €
• Fronto-ethmoidal mucocele...
   Price 8.50 €
• Reconstruction of a trans...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Ectopic ossification in t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Comparison of radical (na...
   Price 10.50 €
• Observational study to as...
   Price 14.00 €
• Tinnitus: first symptom o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Notes on voice and speech...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 771.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE