Home Your basket
• Solitary fibrous tumor of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Massive bone dystrophic l...
   Price 5.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Giant metastasis invading...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic thyroid basi-ling...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 267.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2000 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Pharyngeal pouch surgery : a five year review


Authors : M. A. Siddiq, P. J. Patel (Walsall)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2000;121,1:37-40.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : The treatment of pharyngeal pouch varies widely. Our aim was to establish current and recent practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in our department and set guidelines for future management. A retrospective audit over a 5-year period was performed with all data derived from patient notes. 28 procedures were performed on 24 patients with a mean age of 72 years. Over two thirds of these patients (68%) underwent an endoscopic procedure (stapling or diathermy) and the remainder underwent excision (14%), inversion (10%), cricopharyngeal myotomy (4%) or dilatation (4%). The primary diagnostic investigation performed was a barium swallow in 17 cases, but in 7 cases, referred by gastroenterologists, an oesophagogastroscopy was performed despite characteristic presenting features in all cases. The average inpatient stay was similar for endoscopic and excision procedures (5.5 and 5 days respectively), but longer for inversion procedures (9 days). This was influenced mainly by operative complications. 2 endoscopic stapling procedures were complicated by perforations and 1 patient developed hoarseness after an inversion procedure. The mean follow up time was one month at which stage all asymptomatic patients were discharged. 2 patients treated by endoscopic stapling and 1 patient treated by inversion complained of persistent symptoms and required further surgery. We conclude that endoscopic stapling was the commonest procedure used. Concerning future management, the use of nasogastric tubes after uncomplicated stapling procedures was abandoned. Also it was felt that large pouches should be treated by excision, small pouches by cricopharyngeal myotomy and the remainder by endoscopic stapling. The long-term evaluation of results was also deemed necessary.

Price : 5.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE