Home Your basket
• Solitary fibrous tumor of...
   Price 14.00 €
• Viral assumption and inve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Massive bone dystrophic l...
   Price 5.50 €
• High click stimulus repet...
   Price 10.50 €
• New indications for heari...
   Price 8.50 €
• Implementation of the Eur...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mucosal melanomas of the ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Tympanoplasty: Experience...
   Price 12.00 €
• Distortion product otoaco...
   Price 10.50 €
• Stingy speakers....
   Price 5.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• Tuberculosis of the laryn...
   Price 5.50 €
• Giant metastasis invading...
   Price 5.50 €
• A protocol for the evalua...
   Price 8.50 €
• Complete branchial cleft ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Are we sectioning the coc...
   Price 10.50 €
• Facial paralysis: Functio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Salvage composite resecti...
   Price 10.50 €
• Audit of headache followi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Proposition of adaptation...
   Price 10.50 €
• What is the effect of diz...
   Price 10.50 €
• Partial hearing recovery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Results of alginate and h...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Necrotizing external otit...
   Price 10.50 €
• Ectopic thyroid basi-ling...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cottle's technique septop...
   Price 5.50 €
• The application of tusso...
   Price 10.50 €
• A comparative acoustic st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Zenker’s diverticulum in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal neuroendocrin c...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrences of pleomorphi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal papillomatosis ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retropharyngeal abscess i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic study of sustain...
   Price 10.50 €
• Surgical findings in pati...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• Social consequence of a d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Identification and locali...
   Price 8.50 €
• Phonatory threshold press...
   Price 10.50 €
• The domes crossover: A ne...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reconstruction after hemi...
   Price 14.00 €
• Vocal effectiveness in sp...
   Price 10.50 €
• Endoscopic dacryocystorhi...
   Price 5.50 €
• Management of cerebellopo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Long term results of tymp...
   Price 5.50 €
• Virtual audiovisual talki...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• Migrant foreign body of t...
   Price 10.50 €
• Combined induction chemot...
   Price 10.50 €
• The sound intensity after...
   Price 10.50 €
• Multiple intracranial epi...
   Price 14.00 €
• The place of speech thera...
   Price 8.50 €
• Minimising radiation dose...
   Price 5.50 €
• Proposal of a rating scal...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi-Fujimoto’s diseas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Contribution of clinical ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cervical spondylodiskitis...
   Price 5.50 €
• Autologous fat graft for ...
   Price 14.00 €
• Congenital cholesteatoma ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Far-advanced otosclerosis...
   Price 10.50 €
• Relation between actinomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Feasibility study of sept...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implant in elder...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unilateral frontal sinus ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Spontaneous perforation i...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgical procedure in fir...
   Price 8.50 €
• Combined transoral and su...
   Price 10.50 €
• Medical rhinoplasty: Rati...
   Price 10.00 €
• Genotype – phenotype corr...
   Price 8.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Early evaluation of voice...
   Price 12.00 €
• Pharyngeal pouch surgery ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eye rings: Morphological ...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 735.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2006 o

RHINOLOGY

Comparison of radical (nasalisation) and functional ethmoidectomy in patients with severe sinonasal polyposis. A retrospective study


Authors : R. Jankowski, D. Pigret, F. Decroocq, A. Blum, P. Gillet (Nancy)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2006;127,3:131-140.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: To compare the 5-year outcomes of two endoscopic surgical approaches for diffuse and severe nasal polyposis. Study design: A natural experimental situation gave us the opportunity to compare the results 5 years after radical ethmoidectomy (nasalisation) (n= 39), and functional ethmoidectomy (n= 37). The two surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons on 76 consecutive patients. There was no random assignment for this retrospective study. Methods: Five years after surgery, the criteria for comparison were 1) functional results based on a questionnaire using visual analogue scales in patients free of revision surgery; 2) endoscopic and CT-scan assessments of anatomical results. The CT-scans were blinded and randomized, and opacities were measured using a computerized model; 3) the recurrence rate of nasal polyps. Results: Five years after surgery, the overall nasal functional benefit was scored 8.41 ± 0.40 (mean ± SEM) after nasalisation, and 5.69 ± 0.83 after ethmoidectomy P= 0.002) in patients free of revision surgery. The endoscopic appearance of the mucosa was methodically scored according to a pre-defined scale. Results were significantly better in the nasalisation group (6.03 ± 0.7 versus 3.27 ± 1.0, P= 0.02). A good correlation was found between the endoscopic and CT-scan scores (r= -0.78, P= 0.0001 for nasalisation, and r= -0.65, P= 0.001 for ethmoidectomy). The total recurrence rate was 22.7% in the nasalisation group, and 58.3% in the ethmoidectomy group (c2= 10.41, P< 0.01). Conclusion: Our study suggests that in the treatment of nasal polyposis complete ethmoidectomy leads to better long term results than incomplete ethmoidectomy.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE