Home Your basket
• Hearing aids rehabilitati...
   Price 12.50 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Glomangioma or "glomic tu...
   Price 5.50 €
• "Endolymphatic" cochleo-v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mastoid eosinophilic gran...
   Price 5.50 €
• Efficacy and safety of mo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Clinical implementation o...
   Price 5.50 €
• Malignant melanoma of the...
   Price 10.50 €
• Kikuchi Fujimoto, one cas...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison of stapes prot...
   Price 15.00 €
• Vertebro and cranio veino...
   Price 14.00 €
• Rhinophyma in a black afr...
   Price 5.50 €
• Use of inomeric cement: P...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal dystonia and as...
   Price 8.50 €
• Analysis of the projectio...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of quality of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malignant mixed tumor of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mucus physiopathology, up...
   Price 12.50 €
• The expanding domain of i...
   Price 10.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Traditional and emerging ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Farber's disease: a cause...
   Price 5.50 €
• Aspects of ageing on prof...
   Price 12.00 €
• Central and peripherical ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A rare and unusual cause ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Plastic surgery indicatio...
   Price 10.50 €
• How to take a mastoid and...
   Price 8.50 €
• Metastatic angiosarcoma t...
   Price 5.50 €
• New potentialities of the...
   Price 12.50 €
• Radiofrequency inferior t...
   Price 14.00 €
• Laryngeal pemphigus...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cervical lymph node metas...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Amphicrine adenoma of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Anterior cerebrospinal fl...
   Price 10.00 €
• Description of complicati...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 341.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2002 o

LARYNGOLOGY

The value of the operating video-fiberoscope in the assessment of the head and neck carcinoma.


Authors : M. Folia, V. Woisard, E. Uro-Coste, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,3:163-170.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: the aim of our study was to evaluate the video fiberoscope with operator canal (FOC) in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinoma compared to direct laryngoscopy (DL). Methodology: from August 2000 to May 2001, 82 patients were included in a prospective study. They were examined for pharyngolaryngeal cancer with the FOC, DL and a CAT-SCAN. The compared elements were the visualization of the different regions of the pharyngolarynx. A three dimensional description of the lesion, the presence of secondary localisations as well as the anatomo pathological results were obtained with FOC and DL. Results: although the pharyngolarynx is less well visualized in FOC than in DL (p = 0.04), no statistically significant difference was found between the two methods in terms of visual diagnosis and assessment of the extent of the lesion. The sensitivity of the biopsies made with FOC is lower than those performed with DL (66% FOC, 97% DL). Moreover, we have noted that FOC is highly reliant on the experience and ability of the surgeon. Conclusion: DL remains the most reliable technique for the exploration and diagnosis of the pharyngolarynx . If it is not possible to perform a DL or if it is not indicated (trismus, contra-indication to general anaesthesia) FOC should be considered as the examination of choice.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE