Home Your basket
• Vibrant Soundbridge middl...
   Price 10.50 €
• Type 1 tympanoplasties in...
   Price 12.00 €
• Vertigo and pathology of ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Choanal atresia: therapeu...
   Price 10.50 €
• When to suspect a perilym...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cochlear implant in elder...
   Price 10.50 €
• The effect of the speaker...
   Price 10.50 €
• Art and nose....
   Price 8.50 €
• Utility of positron emiss...
   Price 8.50 €
• Eustachian tube melanoma ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Vertigo: progress and pra...
   Price 8.50 €
• Bullet in the pharynx: En...
   Price 10.50 €
• A perceptual study of the...
   Price 8.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Non-functioning parathyro...
   Price 5.50 €
• Association of thyroid he...
   Price 12.50 €
• A study of consonant inte...
   Price 10.50 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Cowden syndrome: Otolaryn...
   Price 12.00 €
• Lengthening temporalis my...
   Price 10.50 €
• The prevention of voice d...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Follow up of tracheostoma...
   Price 12.00 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Otomycosis: Clinical and ...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 264.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2004 o

PHONIATRICS

Voice handicap evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.


Authors : M. Makeieff, F. Venail, R. Garrel, B. Amy de la Bretèque, A. Giovanni, B. Guerrier (Montpellier)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,5:313-317.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : The importance of patient self-impressions has been emphasized in determining the success of cancer treatment. The supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) is recognized as a suitable procedure for the treatment of T1b and T2 glottic carcinoma. The aim of this surgical procedure is the preservation of a physiologic phonation with optimal oncologic control. Method: Measurements included Voice handicap Index (VHI), Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQL), subjective (GRBAS) and objective analysis. Objectives: evaluate voice problems after SCPL, provide correlations between patients’ daily activities, VHI, and subjective evaluation of the dysphonia. Patients: 53 patients were assessed more than 1 year after SCPL. 26 patients, less than 60 years of age and professionally active were included. The mean age was 48 years (43 to 59 years). Eleven patients had professional activities in the communications industry requiring a compulsory daily use of their voices. Results: 57.6% of the active patients underwent a cessation or an adaptation of their professional activities. The mean VHI was 52.22. It was respectively 36.3, 50.03 and 52.42 according to the grade 1, 2, 3 of dysphonia. Correlations between VHI and the time laps since intervention (p: 0.047), discontinuation of professional activities (p: 0.037), and grade of dysphonia (p: 0.049) were found. Conclusion: VHI allows an evaluation of the voice problems after SCPL. A significant impact on voice is reported after SCPL and may influence the patient’s life, with potential disturbance of their professional activities. Potential post surgical voice impact must be considered when the therapeutic options are discussed.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE