Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Construction and validati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed labyrinthine fist...
   Price 10.50 €
• Learning curve in sialend...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• IPSEN Foundation meeting:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 277.50 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 3 - 2004 o

OTONEUROLOGY

High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?


Authors : M. A. Rocha Santos, M. S. Lei Munhoz, M. A. Lana Peixoto, C. Santos Silva (Belo Horizonte)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,3:151-155.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were qualitatively different from a normal population. Material and method: This study analysed 69 subjects, separated into two groups; a control group composed of 20 females and 20 males; and an MS group composed of 20 females and 9 males. The controls had no history of neurological or otorhinolaryngological disorders. All MS patients presented a normal magnetic resonance imaging of the brainstem. A definite diagnosis of MS was given according to Poser’s criteria for MS research protocols (1983). The following parameters were used in the sutdy of the ABR of each subject: 2000 clicks of 100 ms at 60 dB equivalent peak of sou nd pressure level (pe SPL) above the psycho-acoustic threshold, obtained with the subject’s response to clicks. Both ears were initially stimulated at 11 clicks/s, and then with clicks of same intensity, but with a progressive increase of the stimulus rate to 31, 51, 61 and 71 clicks/s. The analysis of variance with independent factors and repeated measures was used in the statistical analysis of the comparison between group results. Results: The absolute latency of wave III was statistically greater, with a stimulus rate of 51 and 61 clicks/s, in the MS group. The males in the MS group presented a statistically greater absolute latency of wave V with the use of 51 and 61 clicks/s. With stimulus rates above 30 clicks/s, the absolute latency of wave V was also greater for MS females. There were statistically significant differences in the interpeak interval I - III of the control group compared to the MS group, for stimulus rates of 51 and 61 clicks/s, in females and for the stimulus rate of 61 clicks/s in males. This interval was higher in the MS group with these stimulus rates. Conclusion: The results suggest the inclusion of stimulus rates of 51 and 61 clicks/s in the ABR tests of subjects with clinical suspicion of demyelinating diseases like MS.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE