Home Your basket
• Congenital bilateral choa...
   Price 5.50 €
• The value of fine-needle ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cemento-ossifying fibroma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Granular cell tumours (Ab...
   Price 8.50 €
• Treatment of severe epist...
   Price 5.50 €
• Recurrent mandibular amel...
   Price 12.50 €
• Value of the preservation...
   Price 14.00 €
• The tensegrity concept ap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Benign paroxysmal positio...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acoustic recognition of e...
   Price 8.50 €
• Assumptions in surgical t...
   Price 8.50 €
• Orbital decompression in ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Periphery, central and ps...
   Price 10.50 €
• Smile "forced" smile vers...
   Price 10.50 €
• The use of ultrasound eva...
   Price 8.50 €
• The ultra-rapid cinematog...
   Price 10.50 €
• Occult otologic fistulas ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Malt lymphoma of the orbi...
   Price 10.50 €
• Focus on the BPPV: Semont...
   Price 12.50 €
• Acquired non tumoral lary...
   Price 12.00 €
• Cerebro-spinal fluid otor...
   Price 5.50 €
• Immunohistochemistry expr...
   Price 10.50 €
• Neuroplasticity in the au...
   Price 10.50 €
• Hearing loss and vestibul...
   Price 10.50 €
• Can homograft ossicles st...
   Price 5.50 €
• Subacute tuberculous otit...
   Price 8.50 €
• The Voice Handicap Index:...
   Price 10.50 €
• Tonsillitis tuberculous s...
   Price 8.50 €

Total Order 283.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 5 - 2004 o

LARYNGOLOGY

Voice after supracricoid partial laryngectomy: Comparison of two phonatory mechanisms.


Authors : V. Woisard, A. Rollet, M. Puech, E. Serrano, J. J. Pessey (Toulouse)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,5:319-324.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Different laryngeal phonatory mechanisms may be observed at long term after supracricoid laryngectomy. For this study two mechanisms are differentiated. The «dilated» mechanism is the consequence of a forward movement of the neolarynx creating a new resonance cavity. The «contracted» mechanism tallies with the backward contraction of the base of the tongue and the contraction of the posterior pharyngeal wall compressing the neolarynx. Objective: The aim of the study is to determine if the voice outcome is different between these two kinds of mechanisms. Material and method: The method is based on the selection of a homogeneous group: 12 patients operated by cricoepiglottopexy with a follow up superior to two years and with a stable voice and a full neoglottic closure during phonation. The voice quality and the phonatory mechanism are analysed. Regarding voice assessment, a self evaluation with the vocal handicap index adapted for the study and the GRBAS scale are carried-out. Frequency (usual, minimum, maximum, range) and loudness are used to appreciate the vocal capacities. The phonatory mechanism is studied by videolaryngostroboscopy, performed tongue free, with a normal /e/ and a high-low transition pitch. Results: The outcomes point out a difference between the two mechanisms. The best vocal results are observed in the «dilated» mechanism for the studied parameters and mainly for the frequency parameters. Conclusion: The discovery of numerous phonatory mechanisms after supracricoid laryngectomy independent from neoglottic closure lead us to further studies of the impact of this type of surgery on articulatory patterns.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE