Home Your basket
• Voice rehabilitation afte...
   Price 10.50 €
• Liposarcoma of the hypoph...
   Price 5.50 €
• Retrosigmoid vestibular n...
   Price 5.50 €
• The Bell Labs contributio...
   Price 12.50 €
• Laryngeal paraganglioma m...
   Price 8.50 €
• Total pharyngolayngectomy...
   Price 10.50 €
• Post operative Caldwell-L...
   Price 10.00 €
• Art and nose....
   Price 8.50 €
• Dynamic palatography: Dia...
   Price 12.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Prosodic analysis of spee...
   Price 10.50 €
• Validation of a self asse...
   Price 10.50 €
• Unusual location of pleom...
   Price 12.50 €
• Decompression surgery for...
   Price 8.50 €
• Voice Handicap Index adap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Asymptomatic findings on ...
   Price 14.00 €
• "Endolymphatic" cochleo-v...
   Price 10.50 €
• Prevalence of sensineural...
   Price 14.00 €
• Context influence on the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• The symphonix symposium u...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evaluation of the use of ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Technique of upper blepha...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation and treatment ...
   Price 8.50 €
• A report of two cases of ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Functional septal surgery...
   Price 10.50 €
• Importance of a molding n...
   Price 10.50 €
• Interventional phoniatry...
   Price 14.00 €
• A new case of rhinosclero...
   Price 5.50 €
• Mycobacterial cervical ly...
   Price 10.50 €
• Mast cells in chronic inf...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral cleft lip and c...
   Price 14.00 €

Total Order 311.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 1 - 2012 o

PHONIATRICS

Prosodic features of computer-assisted presentations: A preliminary study


Authors : Robieux C, Révis J, Ghio A, Giovanni A. (Marseille, Aix en Provence)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2012;133,1:3-8.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Introduction: Computer-assisted presentations (CAP) seem to be characterized by changes of rhythm and melody of speech, compared to spontaneous speech, in many cases with periods with rapid and excessively regular breaks interspersed with long pauses. Methods: We analyzed the prosody and especially the pace in the temporal organization of prominences (distribution of stress, articulatory speed, pause duration) in 37 inexperienced subjects in a CAP corresponding to an actual review of graduation. The results were compared with a presen­ta­tion without support (PWS) conducted immediately after the first. A jury had to propose a gradation of prosody (typical CAP, intermediate, non-typical). Accentual distribution was analyzed from a perceptual experiment. The articulatory speed and length of breaks were analyzed from the speech signal. Results: We found the main elements of prosodic style assumed in three-quarters of subjects. This style was characterized by a faster articulatory rate and a more regular and rhythmic breaks due to excessive elongation of silent pauses when changing view of the slide. Discussion: The assumption seems validated because the majority of subjects in our study are of particular prosodic rhythm (faster and more regular). Subjects with arche­typal prosody of CAP appear to be those whose speech follo­wed closely their slide presentation, which disrupted their com­mu­nication.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE