Home Your basket
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• The “Deglutition Handicap...
   Price 10.50 €
• Fungal infections of para...
   Price 8.50 €
• Experimental study on sim...
   Price 10.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Eagle syndrom: A case rep...
   Price 8.50 €
• Guidelines for the clinic...
   Price 12.50 €
• Importance of swallowing ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Thyroid pseudo-nodules: 3...
   Price 5.50 €
• Chronitis tonsillitis...
   Price 8.50 €
• Investigations on the ton...
   Price 10.50 €
• Cosmetic radiofrequency...
   Price 10.50 €
• A survey of current wound...
   Price 5.50 €
• What we don’t know about ...
   Price 12.50 €
• Respiratory epithelial ad...
   Price 12.50 €
• Giant pleomorphic adenoma...
   Price 5.50 €
• The EXIT procedure: Princ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Comparative study using A...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reverse phonation: Pathol...
   Price 8.50 €
• Evolution of facial nerve...
   Price 10.50 €
• Therapeutic management of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Progressive cochleo-vesti...
   Price 5.50 €
• Usefulness and limitation...
   Price 10.50 €
• Use of a laryngeal mask d...
   Price 8.50 €
• Kikuchi's disease as the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Reports to the General As...
   Price 10.50 €
• Total ossicular reconstru...
   Price 10.50 €
• Schwannoma of the postcri...
   Price 5.50 €
• Osteoid osteomas in the f...
   Price 5.50 €
• Rhinoplasty: Advantages a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Acinic cell carcinoma in ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Laryngeal cryptococcosis ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Principes underlying the ...
   Price 10.50 €
• Diffuse cervical cellulit...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of laryngeal sialo...
   Price 10.50 €
• Subdural empyema complica...
   Price 5.50 €
• Treatment of acute mastoi...
   Price 8.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic augmentation of...
   Price 10.50 €

Total Order 361.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2002 o

AUDIOLOGY

Usefulness and limitations of speech audiometric testing in the detection of professional nose-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting.


Authors : E. Babin, A. Bequignon, M. Goullet de Rugy, E. Edy, S. Moreau, J. P. Izard, A. Valdazo (Caen)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2002;123,4:213-217.

Article published in french
Downloadable PDF document french



Summary : Objective: the objective of this study is the evaluation of the calculation of 100% intelligibility threshold and noise resistance index as a monitoring test in populations exposed to noise in their work environment. Method: this is a retrospective exposed-unexposed study as the exposure to the risk factors took place before the survey. The exposed subjects were chosen in principle on sonometric criteria and the unexposed subjects among employees whom we believe were not exposed. The exploration method included history taking, clinical examination, free field audiometry and speech audiometry with background noise. Results: the exposed population has a 100% intelligibility threshold on average equal to 29.69 dB, significantly higher than in the unexposed population where it is calculated at 25.30 dB (p=0.07). The noise resistance index varies with age (p=0.04). Conclusion: our study shows the existence of a significant hearing difference between two populations with different noise exposure. It demonstrates a relationship between a hearing loss risk factor such as noise and the occurrence of the "professional hearing loss" disorder. The calculation of the 100% intelligibility index and the noise resistance index advantageously complements tonal audiometry. These procedures provide a better approach to the social impact of hearing loss but were not useful in the detection of hearing loss.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE