Home Your basket
• Nasal cutaneous cryptococ...
   Price 5.50 €
• Cholesteatoma and osteora...
   Price 14.00 €
• The supracricoid laryngec...
   Price 10.50 €
• The clinical significance...
   Price 5.50 €
• Sinonasal malignant schwa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Laryngeal schwannoma: A c...
   Price 8.50 €
• Revascularized free scapu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Polymorphisms of the huma...
   Price 10.50 €
• Construction and validati...
   Price 10.50 €
• Extramuscular soft tissue...
   Price 8.50 €
• An important procedure in...
   Price 8.50 €
• Delayed labyrinthine fist...
   Price 10.50 €
• Learning curve in sialend...
   Price 10.50 €
• Bilateral facial nerve pa...
   Price 5.50 €
• Human skull development a...
   Price 10.50 €
• Role and importance of pH...
   Price 12.00 €
• Sinonasal malignant melan...
   Price 5.50 €
• Middle ear barotraumas du...
   Price 8.50 €
• Surgery of mucocele of th...
   Price 10.50 €
• A schwannoma of the hypog...
   Price 8.50 €
• Acute acoustic trauma, a ...
   Price 12.00 €
• IPSEN Foundation meeting:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Spontaneous cholesteatoma...
   Price 8.50 €
• Manual care in voice reha...
   Price 8.50 €
• Diagnostic value of fine-...
   Price 8.50 €
• The role of larynx kinest...
   Price 10.50 €
• Arachnoid granulations of...
   Price 10.50 €
• Characteristics of the ma...
   Price 12.50 €
• A simple assessment of qu...
   Price 10.50 €
• Evaluation of the handica...
   Price 10.50 €
• Comparison between extern...
   Price 10.50 €
• Aesthetic parotidectomy: ...
   Price 8.50 €
• Endobronchial lipomas and...
   Price 5.50 €
• Free novascularized bone ...
   Price 15.00 €
• Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid...
   Price 10.50 €
• A case of nasal NK/T cell...
   Price 5.50 €
• Postural control accordin...
   Price 10.50 €
• Correlation between laryn...
   Price 10.50 €
• The «intra-cordal polyp»:...
   Price 5.50 €
• Nasopharyngeal tuberculos...
   Price 5.50 €

Total Order 365.00 €

contents
2019
   N# 1 |
2018
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2017
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2016
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2015
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2014
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2013
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2012
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2011
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2010
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2009
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2008
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2007
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2006
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2005
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2004
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2003
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2002
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2001
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
2000
   N# | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1999
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1998
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
1997
   N# 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
1996
   N# 4 | 5 |

Click on the number of the review to see the content
Teaching bulletin CME
List of all teaching bulletins CME.
Editor reading committee
Editor reading committee.
To publish...
Instructions for authors
Archives Press and Books
Select of books and press articles.
Mailing list
News information letter.
Subscription prices


If you wish to adjust the size of the displayed characters, click in the high menu on "Your account" and choose the desired size.



  Contents > Previous page > Article detail print Order
o Issue N# 4 - 2004 o

OTONEUROLOGY

Vision preference in dynamic posturography analysed according to vestibular impairment and handicap


Authors : N. Perez, J. Rama, E. Martinez Vila (Pamplona)

Ref. : Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2004;125,4:215-221.

Article published in english
Downloadable PDF document english



Summary : Objective: The objective of this work was to characterise the implications of vision preference derived from the sensory organisation test of computerised dynamic posturography, in terms of impairment, disability and handicap. Material and method: This was a prospective assessment of 88 patients suffering from dizziness who denied experiencing any visually induced vertiginous symptoms. The level of impairment of each patient was estimated by performing a complete analysis of vestibular function by means of the caloric and rotatory stimulation tests. Disability and handicap were determined with the Dizziness Handicap Inventory questionnaire (DHI). Results: The results of the caloric test in patients were independent of vision preference although canal paresis was more frequently abnormal in patients without visual preference. No differences were found in the results of rotatory stimulation by means of impulse and sinusoidal tests, both at high velocities of stimuli, in between patients with and without vision preference. Similarly, the responses in the DHI, a common questionnaire for vestibular disability and handicap and, specifically to questions addressing the problem of visual and vestibular disability, were not able to differentiate either group of patients. Nevertheless, we have found that patients with vision preference tend to have poorer balance. Conclusion: We consider that in the patients studied here, vision preference must be considered as a normal finding as this represents a normal strategy in a subject that relies more heavily on visual cues for his or her postural control.

Price : 10.50 €      order
|


Subscribe online - Pay by credit card!


© Copyright 1999-2024 - Revue de Laryngologie   Réalisation - Hébergement ELIDEE